After the direct positive confrontation the investigator should

• A. create a period of intentional silence for three to five seconds
• B. restate the accusation
• C. offer a reward
• D. threaten consequences

Answer: (A)

After directly confronting the suspect with the evidence, a brief intentional silence of three to five seconds gives them space to think and respond. This pause reduces the urge to keep talking, which can lead to more honest admissions, and it signals confidence in what you’ve presented rather than pushing or pressuring them. It often prompts a confession or a clarification as the silence becomes uncomfortable for someone who is not telling the truth.

Restating the accusation would be redundant, and offering a reward or threatening consequences can undermine the integrity of the process and push the respondent toward false or coerced statements.