Unless the suspect __________ asserts their right to counsel the interrogator need not cease questioning.

• A. Equivocally
• B. Clearly and unambiguously
• C. Silently
• D. Privately

Answer: (B)

The key idea is that the right to counsel is only triggered if the suspect clearly and unambiguously asks for a lawyer. When the invocation is explicit and unequivocal, the interrogation must stop. If the statement is ambiguous or equivocal, officers may continue questioning, because there’s no plain, unmistakable request to counsel.

So, saying the suspect must “clearly and unambiguously” assert their right fits this standard: it marks a definite, unmistakable invocation that halts questioning. If the invocation is vague or silent, the interrogator need not cease.